Handed everything in before 12:30 and have just been waiting to get the spreads printed properly with Darren. Also, thanks to the point Sally made, I am just going to burn everything onto a CD…better to lose the CD rather then the USB stick. I might not be able to fit all the files in but the essentials one should be able to fit fine. I tried opening the files on one of the macs here and if you install the fonts I put into the ‘components’ folder first, it works just fine (even though when I was installing Segoe UI it looked like a foreign language font for some reason but ended up just fine in the end). But, in case anything goes wrong there is the PDF as well.
List of components turned in:
- big sketchbook
- A4 notebook with notes, sketches, ideas etc (I scanned all the pages for this unit, put them on photobucket and posted them throughout this blog).
- a series of worksheets clipped together of the various stages of the project (including annotations or in some case references to where the annotations can be found on this blog).
- CD with the InDesign file, PDF file, fonts, photos and other relevant stuff
- A2 and A3 print out of the final pieces
Here’s my self-evaluation for this unit.
I think that the worksheets of the progression of my work (esp. the tumult of variations and changes) speak for itself…..I have really learned A LOT from this unit not only about the software but also in terms of a crash course in typography. In the first few entries in this blog I mentioned how I really hadn’t done much typography before so for this project I really wanted to go indepth with it, in terms of the principles of typography and how to apply them to my work. With most project this year I kept planning to learn about typography, but I haven’t done that properly until now. I really do find it very true that the best way to learn something new is by doing it, whether it’s learning a new software or the nuances of typography. As Vince Frost says in his interview, every project you do has a knock-on effect on the others and I do find this to be the case, that with every project I am taking on board new skills and information and then applying to to the future projects (though at times these things become second nature).
In terms of software, I am really pleased that we are doing the qualification for InDesign and I actually wish we could have done such qualifications for all the other softwares as well….it really helped me learn how to use it properly and I feel quite competent and confident with InDesign now. Oh and just to clarify, I did all the typography in InDesign, but the visuals (which started out rather artistic but then became a bit more simplified) I did in Photoshop. It’s much easier to create visuals in Photoshop then in InDesign because of the variety of options you have (such as creating clip masks….basic functions such as resizing, opacity and changing colour seem to be much easier to do in Photoshop as well, unline in InDesign where you have to ’scale’ everything and can’t just drag it to whatever size you want – as far as I know that’s the way to do it in InDesign). I also used Illustrator a bit at the end for importing the images into InDesign since they would get pixelated from Photoshop to Indesign, but were alright from Illustrator to InDesign. So, I like how I ended up using a variety of the programs we have learned this year…quite a nice way to begin to conclude the year by bringing what I have learned together.
I will most definitely take the experiences, which I learned the hard way I think since it didn’t come to me naturally and I really had to work at it, and apply them to future projects. I am sure that I can apply a lot of this to the upcoming Live Briefs/Work Placements.
What I found most difficult was a) the typography aspects obviously b) creating a final result which answered the brief appropriately. As I have already written about in multiple entries, the main comment in tutorials and crits was that I should step back and see if it really answers the brief, whether it is really something you would see in a magazine. For this brief I had to really consciously pull away from my illustrative tendencies (which is difficult since I have a fine-art background). As you can see from the worksheets, it was getting very close to the deadline and I was still struggling with answering the brief appropriately with my design. It was rather frustrating, but I stripped away all the artsy bits and tried to make it as simple and straight-forward as possible….and with a bit of guidance in the right direction it all worked out I think. The typography aspect was obviously difficult as well and I have lost track of the times I have had to look up terms such as leading, tracking, kerning, soft return etc. but the repetitiveness has paid off and I think I have come a long way from when I started.
It was definitely a challenge and even though I do wish that I had come across my final solution a bit earlier, I don’t think it could have been helped….I was making a conscious effort to do things in stages (which I did do and am rather proud of that), so I don’t think it was really a matter of bad time planning. It just really took a lot of stages to get to where I am now with the design and I don’t think it could have been helped, I kept checking in with Sally and Kit with new variations every few days and just reworking them and reworking them. In the end I do think I have created a successful, professional, magazine-worthy design.
Because of the problems which arose along the way (as I just explained) things did get piled up a bit towards the end. With just maybe an extra day or two I think I could have gotten everything sorted out nicely, but what’s done is done and working to deadlines is a big thing in the real world and I will have to learn to deal with it and accept it. If I could I would organize and cross-reference things much better (I have just seen how some people have A3 folders with everything and this would be a nice way to arrange it I think…something to consider for the future). Also I should have started the worksheets earlier on and kept updating them throughout the project (again something to do in the future). Must work on better presentation in general so that it’s coherent and user-friendly….again something to practice for a real-world scenario of presenting work to a client where everything counts – the quality, presentation, content, coherence, user-friendly-ness.
The final design is meant to be for Computer Arts (and yes as Sally knows I misunderstood the paper weight instructions, I thought we were just supposed to write down what weight in gsm the magazine pages are…but instead we were supposed to find our own samples and choose a paper out of those….so….note to self: listen/read instructions more carefully! a client would NOT be happy by something like this surely). I believe the overall look of the design is professional and elegant and finally the text has plenty of room to breathe and really work that space on the page (also the visuals no longer clash with everything and don’t overpower the text). The target audience would be professionals and aspiring students such as ourselves…which I think is the target audience of Computer Arts. Their magazine is aimed specifically at the design community, though I think that my article could be understood by any reader (designer or not) since it isn’t too technical.